View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2009, 01:25 AM
Zor Prime Zor Prime is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Default

Lancenigo di Villorba (TV), Italy































You treated about titrimetry of polyprotic acids.















You stated that :In polyprotic acids, the last equivalence point the sharpest on a titration curve.































You get reason.















Now, I start from a diprotic acid which i will define H2X like a WEAK DIPROTIC ACIDIC SPECIES able to ionize in aqueous solutions like it happen by following equilibria































i) H2X(aq) + H2O(aq) --- HX-(aq) + H3O+(aq)















Ka1 = |HX-| * |H3O+| / |H2X|































ii) HX-(aq) + H2O(aq) --- X--(aq) + H3O+(aq)















Ka2 = |X--| * |H3O+| / |HX-|































So, once you began ACID/BASE TITRIMETRY, you began addiction of chemical equivalent of Strong Base (e.g. usually NaOH) to















Title-Defined aqueous solution of Acidic Species H2X.















So, Acidic Species H2X exists besides its former derivative, e.g. HX- coming from former Chemical Equilibrium Relationship. Since H2X is Acidic Species and HX- is its Salts, it is appearing a Chemical Buffer obeying to HASSELBACH WRITING































pH = pKa1 - log (|H2X| / |HX-|)































Some times later, NaOH added get meaning to Second Chemical Equilibrium : this happen once Chemical Equivalent of Added NaOH moved over half Chemical Equivalent of H2X Acids.















THIS IS LATTER EQUIVALENCE POINT WHICH OBEYS TO ADAPTED HASSELBACH WRITING































pH = pKa2 - log (|HX-| / |X--|)































SINCE NaOH FORMED A SECOND CHEMICAL BUFFER.















This Chemical Buffer has a very low BUFFER CAPACITY BECAUSE EVERY NaOH ADDICTION TO THIS LATTER CONDITION AREN'T ABLE TO NEUTRALIZE ACIDIC SPECIES SO IT AFFECT HEAVILY pH INDEX.































I hope this helps you.
Reply With Quote