Sorry but the sceptic in me isn't that easily convinced.
Anyone who is hell bent on carrying out a terrorist act WOULD NOT get into any argument with anyone, never mind a guard. From the guy's description given by the media themselves mind you, it sounds he wouldn't know how to wipe his own ar$e, never mind being smart enough to construct an explosive device and plant it somewhere in order to cause mass casualties. Oh dear double standards, crapped on their own story before convincing the mass population.
Extract from the article - ''The prosecution told the court how Lewington had said to one woman that the only good Paki was a dead Paki. Oops I am sorry, how many times did I read that right here in Current Events prior to comment or question being deleted??? More times than I can remember, do we brand those people as terrorists too??
And how long will it be before the media expands on this SAD story to tell us that this individual used internet to obtain information on how to build the explosives device??? Would be perfect and reinforce the calls for total censorship of the net like some European countries are trying to pass as a law already.
I am not saying that certain people fit a profile of a terrorist more than others, but unfortunately they do. Judging by the information given and the look of this individual, he is still probably figuring out what day of the week it is.
|